Ted Dykstra and Jordan Pettle (photo credit: Cylla von Tiedemann)
by Shannon Christy
The good qualities consist of Dana Osborne’s stage design and the soundscape by Mike Ross. There is no fourth wall: the audience surrounds the performers. This allows the spectators to feel as if they are literally stumbling across two confused men questioning everything around them, while allowing the actors to interact naturally with the audience. (At one point, Guildenstern discusses the relevance of their conversation, as he steps down from the stage and used me as a live example of audience boredom to Rosencrantz. What a great tongue in cheek joke; using the actual text he was given to challenge a live audience member at the same time… I couldn’t stop laughing at the idea - especially knowing that all the while, he was probably trampling that poor shopping bag a careless spectator had left in the alley.) In addition, Mike Ross’s soundscape with its clever use of effects, and great transitions is effective in giving the piece direction and grabbing audience attention. Unfortunately this and the set are among the only provoking concepts in this production.
As for the acting? It must be presumed that it is more difficult to work with a good script that is well known to the public than a crappy one that is not. The former is difficult to improve and the latter is open to interpretation. I assume this was the dilemma of this troupe because the only thing they brought to the production was the ability to deliver a joke. Ted Dykstra (Rosencrantz), Jordan Pettle (Guildenstern), and Kenneth Welsh (Player) put on an entertaining spectacle but when it is said and done it was just washed away like snow from the rain.
@schristy79 |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. Please read our guidelines for posting comments.